Saturday, 27 October 2007

One more witness contradicts Jane Tanner statement

A teenager, who was with her family at Ocean Club, saw Gerry McCann and Jeremy Wilkins talking, the night Madeleine disappeared – but she didn't saw Jane Tanner or a man carrying a child. The girl wasn't in the list of guests, as their presence at Ocean Club wasn't registered with the management. Father and daughter have been in Portugal, recently, to help Policia Judiciaria in the reconstruction of what happened the night of May 3 and to give a formal statement to Police, according to a source close to the case.

Speaking to SOS Madeleine, the Irish teenager confirmed she saw Gerry McCann and Jeremy Wilkins talking, for a few minutes, near the McCann apartment: “There was only the father of the little girl talking to another man.”

The teenager went out for a cigarette, around the same time Jane Tanner said she saw a man carrying a child. She only mentioned what she saw to her family latter, because she had also to confess the reason why she was there. Since the beginning, Police had some doubts about Jane Tanner statement, as Jeremy Wilkins, a tennis partner of Madeleine's father, told them he only saw Gerry McCann near the apartment.

Jane Tanner description of the man she allegedly saw was used to draw a sketch that the McCann released, yesterday, October 25. But Jane Tanner was initially quoted, in the British Media, as saying that the man was walking to the church. Later, British newspapers referred she said the man was walking in the opposite direction, to Robert Murat's house.

Jeremy Wilkins told the Press he was walking his eight-month son when he met Gerry McCann, who was checking his children. The TV producer said he didn't saw a man carrying a child and he also didn't saw Jane Tanner: "It was a very narrow path and I think it would have been almost impossible for anyone to walk by without me noticing.”

After a few weeks claiming they couldn't talk to the Media because of Portuguese secrecy laws, the McCann accepted to be interviewd by Antena 3, a Spanish TV channel. Gerry McCann praised the Portuguese Police but, at the same time, the usual “family friends” were quoted by the British Media in another attack to the credibility of Portuguese police, who hasn't recorded the statements given by Madeleine parents. This is denied by a PJ source, who told that “all formal questionings of the McCann were recorded, but no recording was made from the informal meetings with them.”

Statements given to Police, in the Portuguese legal system, are only used in the investigation and even confessions are not valued by courts, as only statements made during trial are considered evidence.

Duarte Levy and Paulo Reis

Version Française


Anonymous said...

Oddly enough, another Irish family--father, mother, and two tennagers--reported seeing a man very much matching Tanner's description, walking past the church, towards the waterfront, at approximately the same time. They gave their report in May, and it appears they have also been back to confirm their sighting in an official interview since. So, what exactly was your point?

Blythe said...

Anon, his point is that Jane Tanner is either mistaken or not telling the truth.
Miss Tanner has now changed her story at least four times.

Have your Irish family changed their story four times?
If they did would you be so eager to believe the veracity of their statement?

Anonymous said...

It is common knowledge Jane Tanner lied about this "abductor."

Based on her description, which would require a photographic memory as the man was supposed to be of no importance at the time, it is impossible for her to know if it was a man or a woman as Tanner claims she never saw the face. But she claims it was a man, proving in her own tangled web that she is a liar and this is just a story to perpetuate the abduction myth.

Also her description has changed over time from not being sure if it was a child wrapped in a blanket to being certain it was a child and probably Madeleine and the artist's impression shows no blanket.

Then we have O'Brien, her partner. He claimed he went back to carry on socialising after his daughter was sick. Either he is a liar too or he is the worst parent in Britain (after the McCanns).

It is blatently obvious Tanner and O'Brien are lying and are part of the cover up. The sooner they come forward and tell the truth for once the better.

Anonymous said...

So is Jane Tanner covering up for her partner, O´Brien, who was the last one to check the sleeping kids? Is that what you are suggesting?

Anonymous said...

Jane Tanner's "cartoon"! Does anyone call it a "description"?