Wednesday, 2 July 2008

July 7 High Court session “postponed”

The story published today by the Guardian has another very interesting paragraph. It says that the McCann “were due to launch a high court case in London on Monday to get access to details of the case held by Leicestershire police, their local force. It is believed this case will be postponed while the couple await news from Portuguese prosecutors.” So, that Court action was due do be launched on July 7.

On June 21, The Daily Mail wrote: “The McCanns have now applied to the court to consider ordering Leicestershire Police to disclose their files on scores of reported sightings of their missing daughter - many of which have been passed on to them by police in Portugal (...) The case will be heard in the High Court on July 7 in the Family Division. However, it is not known if it will be heard in open court because Madeleine is a minor, and has protected status as a ward of court.” Clarence Mitchell is quoted, in that edition of the Daily Mail, as saying: “An application has been made on Madeleine's behalf by her parents for disclosure of certain documents.”

On June 23, on The Telegraph, Clarence Mitchell was more precise: ““I can state that on the instigation of Gerry and Kate McCann Madeleine is a ward of the High Court of England and Wales. An application has been made on Madeleine’s behalf by her parents for disclosure of certain documents. The hearing is currently scheduled for July 7 in the High Court in London.”

So, according to the Daily Mail, on June 21, the McCann had already “applied to the court to consider ordering Leicestershire Police to disclose their files on scores of reported sightings of their missing daughter (...)” Clarence Mitchell even confirmed that “an application has been made on Madeleine's behalf by her parents for disclosure of certain documents.”

And according to The Telegraph, on June 23, Clarence Mitchell went further and, after confirming the “application has been made” also said that the hearing was “scheduled for July 7 in the High Court in London.” But, according to the Guardian, on July 2, the McCann “were due to launch a high court case in London”, on July 7, “to get access to details of the case held by Leicestershire police, their local force.” Am I missing some detail, or this is a little bit confused?

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Read it again Paulo!

Shu said...

The missing details are from Uk power manipulation.


From Joana´s Blog:

If it is real...is very,very sad.

"the hearing of the Irishman who, in his first witness statement, early September last year, guaranteed to the PJ that he saw Gerry carry a child away in his arms on the evening of the disappearance, having clarified that he only remembered who it actually was after he saw on television how the missing child’s father carried Sean, one of her siblings, when they arrived at Birmingham airport."

**********************
To talk by defense=retirement;
To forget or not forget is another question.

No good if it is true!

Cláudia said...

The truth spin style.

- Faceless man/hairy guy
- Can see the apartment/haven't seen anyone entering the apartment
- Locked/unlocked door
- Forced shutters/untouched shutters
- Morocco, Spain, Portugal
- Cuddlecat on shelf/ Cuddlecat on the bed
- Great detective agency M3/ Ooops, let's hire another great detective agency because this one has come up with zilch (but managed to move to new headquarters!)
- Have applied/will apply
- ...

Shu said...

Destak.pt

Anonymous said...

En mi opinion, la jubilación de Amaral ha desencadenado toda esta información de falta de pruebas deliveradamente. Los McCann deben estar con acidez de estomago y aterrados, por si se desata la lengua (y el libro) del Sr. Amaral.Adelante Sr. Amaral, desde aquí le animo a que siga adelante,queremos LA VERDAD SOBRE LA MENTIRA de estos irresponsables padres. Itziar

Anonymous said...

Did you all know that Big Brother has got another logo identical to maddie's "LOOk" with the eye defect which has now been removed in their official site?

Did you know the pro blog has got a thread on BB?

Did you know on one programme the official site find madeleine was advertised there in the subtitles?

Did you know Virgin sponsors the programme?

Links:
http://www.the3arguidos.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=17211&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
----------------
http://www.channel4.com/bigbrother/

Anonymous said...

Gerry and Kate McCann Are Still Guilty!
By: Chris Freind, The Bulletin
07/02/2008
http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=19820607&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=8

Anonymous said...

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/list_family.htm


Hope you are well
xx

Anonymous said...

http://www.the3arguidos.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=17680&p=463279#p463279

Interesting thread
xx

Anonymous said...

re: interesting thread

According to Redsquare "the reports came out after the court hearing".

"The reason for the confusion is because online articles are forever being re-written. What you have, in the times quoted above, is the first time 'an' article appeared - not the time 'that' article appeared"

xx