Monday, 1 September 2008

The tennis tournament (*)

On the afternoon of May 3, 2007, it was planned a tennis tournament, only for men, organized by the Ocean Club management. The Tapas 7 and their children went to the beach. Madeleine and the twins spend the morning at the crèches and had lunch with Gerry and Kate, in the apartment. The children were taken back to the crèches between 2:30/2:50 pm, according to Gerry's statement to PJ on May 10, 2007.

After lunch, the McCann couple spend some time at the tennis court and later Kate went jogging to the beach. Gerry stay playing. They met again around 5:30 pm, in the area near the Tapas Bar, where all children from both crèches were having “high tea”.

Kate said that she and Gerry went back to apartment, with the children, around 5:40 pm and gave them bath, together (statement to PJ, September 6, 2007). They thought about taking the children to the playground area, after bath, but decided not to do it, that day, because the children were really very tired. Just before 6:00 pm, Gerry left the apartment and went to the tennis court.

Kate had just finished to take a shower, around 6:30/6:40 pm, when somebody knocked at the door (the door facing the swimming pool). She put a towel around herself and went to the door, where she saw David Payne. Payne went to the apartment to help take the children to the playground, according to Kate, because Gerry asked him to do that.

According to his statement, on September 7, 2007Gerry was playing tennis. At around 6:30 pm, David Payne came from Paraíso bar, and asked him if he was going to keep playing. Gerry said he didn't know, because Kate could need some help to take care of the three children, as they intended to take them to the playground, after the bath.

Gerry “thinks” Payne offered to check if Kate needed help, and came back few minutes after. Questioned about the contradiction with his previous statement (from May 4, 2007), where he told that Payne came back 30 minutes after leaving to check Kate and the children, Gerry said that he was referring to the period of time it took Payne to make a second come back to the tennis court - David returned to the tennis court, few minutes after 6:30 pm, following his check on Kate. Then, he went out again, according to Gerry, to go to his apartment and change clothes, to play tennis.

When Payne knocked at the A5 apartment, Kate said she talked with him for 30 seconds (statement to PJ, September 7, 2007) and told him the children were not going to the playground area, as planned. Payne didn't came inside the living room, just stood at the door, and left to the tennis court, around 6:30/6:40, according to Kate. Gerry came back from tennis at 7:00 pm (he left at 7:20, according to the other three Tapas' men, Russel, Matthew and David Payne, who played tennis until up to 8:00 pm)

At the end of the questioning, on September 7, 2007, PJ detectives asked Gerry if Madeleine was ever hurt, during her stay at Ocean Club. Gerry said he would not comment on that. After the detectives asked the last and formal question – if he had anything else to declare – Gerry McCann said hat he saw no evidence that Madeleine was dead, so he would continue the searching, hoping to find her alive.

When the same formal – and usual – question was put to his lawyer, Mr. Pinto de Abreu, he requested that his client was questioned again about if Madeleine had ever bleed. Gerry answered and said that Madeleine bleed frequently, from her nose, but he ignored if it had happened during the holidays in Portugal.

David Payne, in his statement to Leicestershire Police (LP), on April 2008, said that Gerry asked him to check if everything was all right with Kate, around 6:30 pm, May 3, 2007. After talking with Kate for 3 to 5 minutes, he went to his own apartment, dressed for tennis and went to play with Matthew, Russel and Gerry – but Madeleine's father just played for a little while and left.

Payne, Matthew, Russel and Dan, the Ocean Club tennis coach, played until certainly after half past seven, perhaps until just before eight o'clock, according to David Payne. But Fiona Payne told Leicester Police that his husband was back in the apartment around ten minutes past seven. Her mother, Diane Webster, was more precise, in her statement to LP: she left the tennis court about seven o'clock, May 3, 2007, with her granddaughters and his son-in-law arrived ten minutes after and helped her to bath the children.

(*) Based on statements from:

  • Gerry McCann (May 4, May 10 and September 7, 2007, PJ);

  • Kate McCann (September 6, 2007, PJ)

  • David Payne (April, 2008, LP)

  • Fiona Payne (April, 2008, LP)

  • Dianne Webster (April, 2008, LP)

  • Russel O'Brien (April, 2008, LP)

  • Matthew Oldfield (April, 2008, LP)

84 comments:

Cláudia said...

I always heard that dialogue is a good thing. That it is positive for relationships. Now I'm sure. Dialogue was something clearly missing here.

Anonymous said...

Your statement about the contradiction in Payne's whereabouts is a bit vague. Any chance you could clarify why these two statements contradict each other? Just a very brief summary. I read it that there's a difference of about 20 mins.

Anonymous said...

Not sure this is what you mean to say Paulo. The first line is not good English. It could be misleading:

"according to Gerry's statement, on September 7, 2007, Gerry was playing tennis, around 6:30 pm, when David Payne came from Paraíso bar, and asked him if he was going to keep playing. Gerry said he didn't know, because Kate could need some help to take care of the three children, as they intended to take them to the playground, after the bath. "

It sounds like you are saying that Payne was playing tennis at 6.30 when you mean to say Gerry McCann. It would read better like this:

"according to his statement, on September 7, 2007, Gerry was playing tennis. At around 6:30 pm David Payne came from Paraíso bar, and asked him if he was going to keep playing. Gerry said he didn't know, because Kate could need some help to take care of the three children, as they intended to take them to the playground, after the bath."

The only thing that differs in all their statements is that Gerry first says Payne came back a few minutes later. And in the other that Payne came back about 30 mins later. Kate's statement seems to support the first statement and both of her statements are pretty consistent (sees him at around 6.30 very briefly, Payne asks about the kids and leaves).

If Payne had come straight from the from Paraíso Bar this suggests he might not have been in his tennis gear and may have needed to change before joining the others for the tournament. Perhaps this is why he said he would look in on Kate because he was going in that direction to change?

This could have been cleared up if the Police had asked Kate if Payne was fully dressed or his tennis gear. If Payne wasn't in his tennis gear, then the time it took him to change might have accounted for the missing half hour.

It's interesting but hardly explosive. They've made bigger contradictions in the press.

I am not sure I could even tell you exactly what time my wife left for work this morning. I could give you a rough idea but I wasn't clock watching.

The question about bleeding is a very leading question. Anybody would be wary of that. I'd be interested to hear about other contradictions though. I got the impression from the press that there were lots.

Interesting.

BW

Anonymous said...

No independent witness saw Madeleine after the 'fracas', reported by Mrs Fenn along with the child crying for l hr 15 mins, on Tuesday 1 May.

It is 'normal' for a 3 year old child to become extremely distressed when waking in an alien environment and found her parents 'missing'.

It's very 'abnormal' for three children to be 'put to sleep' (Kate's words) at 7.30 p.m. and not wake in their parents long absences.

The fact that Madeleine's state of distress did not wake her baby siblings upholds the sedation theory and police concerns. PJ were not given results of the 'all revealing' LCN hair analysis; their request for return of the specimens was 'blocked'.

The state of innocence neither requires nor uses corruption as a means to an end.

Truth always speaks for itself in or out of Court.

Paulo Reis said...

BW,

Thank you for your help.

Paulo Reis

Shu/Outono said...

Trialogue!
Upssss,Diana Webster probably she listen many words from her daughter and son in law.....(she was more precise).

A beautiful cross words exercise.

The schema, to me, only with paper and coloured pens; or, talking loud to listen me....

Belos "esquemas",os "esquemas" dos protagonistas.

Deixam um rasto de comportamentos, de todos os níveis, que não acaba.
A Maddie foi prejudicada; a PJ também o foi.

Tramado!

o genro dos gestos desagradáveis foi ajudar o banho das filhas...se calhar,quem acerta é D.W.
Sabe-se lá!

Shu/Outono said...

"Truth always speaks for itself in or out of Court.

01 September 2008 13:13 Anon.
********************************
WE HOPE THAT SO;SO MUCH!
BY MADDIE,PLEASE,JUSTICE TO HER!

Anonymous said...

A new photo? An unknown?
Re-----t Sc-------?( no publicity mine)

****stars*****in****the****Sky*****

S/O/MC

Anonymous said...

One photo!A new....
2,3,4,5,6,7...............

MC

Anonymous said...

Are these small discrepancies really significant? Given that the GNR agents could not remember what Gerry was wearing that evening, why expect them to have total recall of the evening's events...in fact it might be more suspicious if all their statements dovetailed perfectly.

Orlando said...

This is playing with psychological time notion. It is absurd to take any kind of “suspicion” out of this “timing outmatching” . Normally, I never use a watch when playing tennis. Furthermore, people normally does not obsessively worries about exact time movements when they are relaxing in holidays.

Anonymous said...

ALSO, WONDER WHY, PJREIS, YOU HAVE A YAHOO.CO.UK EMAIL ADDRESS. PERHAPS YOU ARE NOT A FREELANCE JOURNALIST BASED IN PORTUGAL AFTER ALL? THERE’S NO EVIDENCE ON GOOGLE.

http://www.linkedin.com/in/rborralho

But look at the above company based in Portugal. It has a Yahoo.com address.

Anonymous said...

THIS IS A COPY AND PASTE FROM:

www.supertroll.blogspot.com

ACCORDING TO FATBOY DUARTE LEVY AND TINYMANHOOD PJREIS, THERE ARE 24 PHOTOS (IN THEIR POSSESSION) THAT WERE TAKEN BY A SPANISH HOLIDAYMAKER IN THE TAPAS BAR AT OCEAN CLUB. LEVY/REIS SAY THAT THE EVIDENCE IN THESE PHOTOS WILL BLOW THE WHOLE CASE APART.

WELL, HERE IS SOME NEWS FOR YOU DUARTE AND REIS: THE OCEAN CLUB IS A BRITISH PURPOSE BUILT RESORT FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF BRITS. THE RESORT IS ALWAYS FULLY BOOKED **WITH BRITISH TOURISTS**. THE ONLY PEOPLE ALLOWED TO DINE AT THE TAPAS BAR WERE PAYING RESIDENTS WHO WERE BRITS. THE PANORAMA PROGRAMME PROVED THIS POINT, THE JOURNALISTS WERE NOT ALLOWED INTO THE TAPAS BAR AND WERE TURNED AWAY AT THE RECEPTION. THEY THEN MUMBLED INTO THE CAMERA - ONLY RESIDENTS ALLOWED IN THERE.

DUARTE AND REIS SAY THEY ARE JOURNALISTS, YET THEY SEEM TO BE UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO DO A LITTLE DIGGING AND CHECK OUT THE BOARDING GUEST LIST AT OCEAN CLUB FOR WEEK ENDING 4th May 2007.

ALSO, WONDER WHY PJREIS HAS A YAHOO.CO.UK EMAIL ADDRESS ON HIS BLOG. PERHAPS HE IS NOT A FREELANCE JOURNALIST BASED IN PORTUGAL AFTER ALL? THERE’S NO EVIDENCE ON GOOGLE.

http://www.linkedin.com/in/rborralho

Look at the above company based in Portugal. It has a Yahoo.com address.

Karmaera said...

Paulo...

A hello from Canada and hope you are well. Popping in to see how you are coming along and read the translations from the police/prosecution files.

One interesting thing to note is that there are no new interviews with the McCann's after their arguido status has been lifted. Now would be considered an optimum time for them to put their 'side of the story' forth and not be hindered by the secrecy law which they often cited as their reason for not being able to be forthcoming with details. In spite of being able to freely speak, we now face silence from them.

Interesting, oui?
:)
I hope you and yours (family) are well and enjoying the last days of summer.

Karmaera

Shu/Outono said...

Of course.If we have not a clock but if we are concerned about help anybody you ask what time is it,no?Or,you have your´s clock at the tennis bag!

*****STARS******IN******THE****SKY!

"29.8.08
About comments...

Please, don't post at my page comments with personal insults to other persons that have posted comments, also. There is a clear difference between criticizing and insulting and I will reject comments with personal insults.

Thank you
Posted by Paulo Reis at 13:47:00 "

Anonymous said...

Anon 00:50 You do not know all the truth, because,me, a Portuguese Woman

I was there! To brit.s only? NO!YOU CAN BE SURE ABOUT THAT,OK?

And,I have mobile photos also with my friends and I can see more...SO?

And,because I am afraid of the brit´s menaces,I do not put my name also.

Anonymous said...

29.8.08
About comments...

Please, don't post at my page comments with personal insults to other persons that have posted comments, also. There is a clear difference between criticizing and insulting and I will reject comments with personal insults.

Thank you
Posted by Paulo Reis at 13:47:00 17 comments


MCR

Anonymous said...

He leido noticias referentes a la paternidad de Gerry.¿Era Madeleine su hija biologica? El 24 horas insinuó que había un donante de esperma pero no lo confirmó nadie.Pregunto: ¿Sabe la PJ si Maddie tenia como padre biologico a Gerry? Esta cuestión es la PRIMERA INFORMACION que un investigador debe saber.No creo que sea tan dificil...

Anonymous said...

anonymous,

'No evidence of Paulo being a freelance journalist on Google'.

Definitely was up until 18th August.
Police have evidence showing the 'theft' of his website and the ID of those running it since.

The criminality in this case is like a cancer ....

Anonymous said...

There's no shortage of troll dialogue here and every other forum! All identified by the police since the illegal takeover of Paulo's site and ID, amongst all others.

Anonymous said...

Trolls, like all liars in this case, have very short memories.

The paparazzi style tourists have been British, Polish and now they are Spanish.

Anonymous said...

Anon 9/48

Re: "The brit´s menaces" as you so crudely describe the temporary tenants of Ocean Club.

Anon 9/48 - A Portuguese woman/citizen, you got what you wanted: 2007 -Ocean Club, a brit ghetto, a base to explore the rest of Portugal, fully booked "with quiet,cultured British tourists" who never caused trouble to Portuguese residents.

2008 Ocean Club is at half capacity, staff dismissed due to lack of clients. Ocean Club will most likely be sold off piecemeal

Shu/Outono said...

Superb!
"Clarence Mitchell chez Freud"
grrrrr

Dizem que a Língua Portuguesa é "traiçoeira" por ter frases ou palavras que se podem levar para a brincadeira.Esta está que nem ginjas.

http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/

Shu/Outono said...

1 nota:

Freud ,mas não o Sigmund!
Por isso achei super a ambiguidade!

Anonymous said...

02 September 2008 16:48

""with quiet,cultured British tourists""

"who never caused trouble to Portuguese residents"


(And Maddie?her parents?)


A must!

" "The brits menaces" as you so crudely describe the temporary tenants of Ocean Club..."

The temporary tenants.....is bad,really:Very bad!
A lot of problems caused BY WHO?

Anonymous said...

Paulo, cualquier padre o madre con un hijo desaparecido, pedirían la reapertura de la investigacion, lo vemos todos los dias.¿Por que los McCann no quieren que se reabra el caso? Que me conteste Clarence.Ana

Anonymous said...

http://www.correiomanha.pt/Noticia.aspx?channelid=00000010-0000-0000-0000-000000000010&contentid=BB22CBB8-7D35-4D91-A4A5-2CF35E0852E5


"São usadas crianças, a maioria entre os seis e os dez anos. Não olham à raça nem ao sexo. São da classe média-alta, médicos, professores e até advogados. Ontem, a Polícia Judiciária fez buscas às suas casas. Foi à residência de 23 indivíduos, de norte a sul do País,

todos com boa situação económica e apresentando níveis elevados de escolaridade.

Apreendeu-lhes os computadores e os telemóveis. Identificou-os por serem suspeitos de alimentarem uma rede de pornografia infantil que funciona na internet e cujo acesso se faz através da troca de imagens.

Conheça todos os pormenores na edição de quinta-feira do jornal 'Correio da Manhã'.

Anonymous said...

02 September 2008 00:18 anon.:

I have a portuguese friend,who lives in Portugal but he like a lot France and his adress is yahoo.fr.

No problem.
Paulo have worked at UK.
__________________________
"29.8.08
About comments...

Please, don't post at my page comments with personal insults to other persons that have posted comments, also. There is a clear difference between criticizing and insulting and I will reject comments with personal insults.

Thank you
Posted by Paulo Reis at 13:47:00 "
_______________________________

I copy and I paste this to all of us remember.
S/O

Anonymous said...

"04.09.2008

Vos photos ne sont jamais parvenues aux enquêteurs portugais


"À se demander quel était le véritable but de l’appel lancé au public… Nous n’avons pas eu accès à ces photos," confirme un des enquêteurs soulignant que les seules photos que la PJ a pu recevoir lui sont arrivées par des témoins directs.

Duarte Levy & Paulo Reis

http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/
****************************

Google translation:

Tradução: Francês » Inglês
Vos photos ne sont jamais parvenues aux enquêteurs portugais

"À se demander quel était le véritable but de l’appel lancé au public… Nous n’avons pas eu accès à ces photos," confirme un des enquêteurs soulignant que les seules photos que la PJ a pu recevoir lui sont arrivées par des témoins directs.


Your photos are never reached the Portuguese investigators


"To wonder what was the real purpose of the call to the public… We have not had access to these pictures," confirms one of the investigators stressed that the only photos that the PJ has been able to receive him arrivals by witnesses direct.


Duarte Levy & Paulo Reis

http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/
******************************

Copy and paste by "one of the many Maria".
S/O

Anonymous said...

Paulo: estive a ler a notícia conjunta,no SOS,acerca das fotos que foram entregues e as quais nunca chegaram cá. As que a nossa PJ tem são as que lhes foram entregues directamente.

Our PJ have photos who many people give directly(pt+bad_english_mine) and "we" must understand why the Leicesteir Police have not send the photos to Portugal. The powerfull forces go "to see and observe"......

I ask(S/O): what will be their objectiv?goal?

**********************

Tb. me parece,Paulo,que está a passar por muita chatice. Acho que é HOMEM para aguentar e enfrentar na maior,com um belo sorriso,cínico,espero,nesses lábios.

A toda a força!ALL THE BEST!

Sempre,com muita admiração,S./O./MCR

Anonymous said...

Just wondering if there was an update on those 24 photos? Any idea what happened to them? I'm imaginging that the Police heard about the Sunday People story and immediately requsted them?

Also, a minor point really, but why did it take 15 months for the spanish tourist to tell people about them? It's not the kind of thing you forget about.

If it had been me I'd have either told the Police immediately or sold them last May when interest was at fever pitch.

guerra said...

http://www.portugalresident.com/portugalresident/showstory.asp?ID=29090

Anonymous said...

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/

"suspects"


suspects?

suspects!

S U S P E C T S.*********XXXXX

Anonymous said...

the sun is overcast and do not wish to spend more money to the "bag".



******

WHERE IS THE TENNIS BAG?
*****************************

By ALEX PEAKE
and VERONICA LORRAINE

Published: Today
THESE were the scenes as two police sniffer dogs investigated the disappearance of little Madeleine McCann — and left her shell-shocked parents wrongly in the frame.

The hounds’ findings persuaded bungling Portuguese cops to name doctors Kate and Gerry as official suspects in the mystery.

You need Flash Player 8 or higher to view video content with the ROO Flash Player. Click here to download and install it.

Now video footage obtained by The Sun — and revealed for the first time today — lays bare the flimsy evidence used to build the case against them.

The 2½-hour film, shot on a police camcorder, chronicles the work of two specially-trained British sniffer dogs.

It details the moments when the springer spaniels apparently detected:

Barking ... the moment Maddie cops say dog made McCanns 'suspects'

Barking ... the moment Maddie cops
say dog made McCanns 'suspects'

#

The scent of a dead body in the McCanns’ rented Renault Scenic, hired 25 days after Maddie vanished shortly before her fourth birthday in May 2007

#

An aroma of blood in a bedroom cupboard in the family’s Praia da Luz holiday apartment, and

#

A smell of death on Kate’s clothes.

Dog handler and ex-PC Martin Grimes is seen working with the dogs, named Keela and Eddie, while Portuguese detectives look on.

He remarks on camera that Keela will detect “very old” blood. Yet local cops quickly leapt on the findings.

Click below to see more pictures of the sniffer dogs searching McCann's property

Click here for slideshow(more to read about....but the articles are from the sun)

Anonymous said...

The 2½-hour film, shot on a police camcorder, chronicles the work of two specially-trained British sniffer dogs.

two specially-trained British sniffer dogs. With British Police also and the sun said all the time yesno/noyes

It is important to them not spend more money OUT or a mcsprocess.

Maddiexxxxxxxxx**********SKY

Anonymous said...

Paulo,desculpe,acho que passo a vida a meter o pé na argola....baseio-me nisto:

..."mas eu sei bem quem é. Digamos que não é uma pessoa propriamente equilibrada. Dou apenas como exemplo o facto de a pessoa em questão acreditar que o blog do PR está a ser 'dirigido' por pessoas que trabalham para o Team e que a identidade do PR foi 'usurpada'. Sabe que a net é o meio mais democrático do mundo. Para o bem e para o mal. E os maluquinhos também têm direito a opinião. :-)
Até amanhã. :-)

************

Penso que sabe de onde tirei isto.
Da jovem que o P. diz "que mau feitio!Mas com um bruto sorriso)
http://proud-of-the-pj.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

Paulo,
There are clear links between Freud Communications and the Labour Party, and it seems inevitable that Mitchell's appointment at Freud was arranged some time ago. Matthew Freud has acted as advisor to Blair on a number of occasions (hosting Labour's 1998 Party Conference) and Freud's wife, Elisabeth Murdoch (daughter of Rupert Murdoch) is a very close friend of Peter Mandelson of the European Commission (and key Blair ally)

More here:

http://www.thesargeants.net/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=170

BW

Cláudia said...

I always loved dogs.

http://br.youtube.com/watch?v=3EHJjpXii9o

Shu/Outono said...

Sinal,sinal,sinal.Não tenho idade para grandes sobressaltos,certo?

Q bom,menos letras agora.Ou,pelo menos mais destacadas.

Shu/Outono said...

6/09- 5 dias depois do dia 1.
*******************************
"Mr. Pinto Balsemão is also the owner of SIC, one of the three TV Portuguese channels and weekly “Expresso”, the leading Portuguese weekly newspaper. “Expresso” has been the most violent critic of Mr. Amaral. Just a coincidence, as we don't believe the Editor, Mr. Henrique Monteiro, and Martin Cabral, one of the columnists, can be influenced by anyone. They are journalists, above all.

Duarte Levy and Paulo Reis

Posted by Paulo Reis at 18:02:00
*********************************

Entrevista exclusiva ao Expresso
McCann tiveram medo de ser presos em Portugal
O Expresso esteve em Inglaterra com Gerry e Kate McCann, na primeira entrevista desde que deixaram de ser arguidos no caso Madeleine. O casal critica Gonçalo Amaral e recusa-se a acreditar que a filha esteja morta.
[ 31 comentários ] [ 7640 visitas ]

http://aeiou.expresso.pt/
******************************
http://sic.aeiou.pt/online/scripts/2007/videopopup2008.aspx?videoId={1349E90A-C59E-460E-9867-D0C074784BA2}
**********************************

http://sic.aeiou.pt/online/scripts/2007/videopopup2008.aspx?videoId={B8AC29C5-3970-4745-A6FA-37903159FBF6}

Shu/Outono said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAdVfGc-d0w

Shu/Outono said...

http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/archive/2008/09/06/voyante-qu-affirme-avoir-travaille-pour-metodo-3-accuse-les.html#comments

Mesmo que tudo esteja baseado em leituras de jornais;de revistas;ouvir tv....o relato é impressionante.Ler o que está no Jornal Argentino(mercurio on-line)impressiona-me.Porque a minha imaginação
(já que não tenho com quem verbalizar,falar,trocar raciocínios directamente;

pois,aqui,só escrevo e não tenho feed-back)

não conseguia,nem consigo ter a frieza necessária para visualizar a(s)realidade(s).

Mas ler,mesmo que seja treta,ler a descrição de um cenário possível,é tramado.

Sim,sou emotiva.

Shu/Outono said...

Esqueci de dizer que cheguei ao jornal através do SOS,do D.L.

Peço desculpa.

Shu/Outono said...

Amaral adds: "For me, Gerry hid the body of Madeleine on the beach. And after some days he transfered it to his car. We were working in this direction.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/2695368/Gerry-McCann-buried-Madeleines-body-on-the-beach-Portuguese-detective-says.html

******

And,of course they do not sue Mr.Gonçalo Amaral because they will risk to come back or to go to the prision,even uk.

Anonymous said...

..."O odor a cadáver detectado no peluche de Madeleine McCann foi comprovado quando, mesmo colocado dentro de um armário fechado, o cão-pisteiro o descobriu."

http://www.correiomanha.pt/Noticia.aspx?channelid=00000009-0000-0000-0000-000000000009&contentid=1927CC62-D478-40BF-BB91-D661A6ED2A11

Muito mais para ler,mesmo on-line.

Anonymous said...

I don't think the McCanns want to sue Mr Amaral. He seems to be doing a very nice job for them as it is. His naive and unrealistic theories proved a timely distraction for what was really going on - and he seems to been more than adequately recompensed.

Interesting that Gerry felt confident enough to bury a child on beach without suffering the risk of being caught. And then risk drawing even more attention to himself by digging her up and putting her into a car some weeks later when media attention was at its height and the place was crawling with TV crews and journalists.

Sounds a very far fetched theory, not least because its unlikely that someone responding to a tragic accident could perform in such a methodical and unemotional way without making a mistake (especially if a little drunk).

Problem with Amaral is that he's not been able to satisfactorily explain the pre-meditated nature of parallel events with the idea of an accident.

And how was Gerry able to sell the idea of a cover-up to 3 very ordinary couples and a grandma so quickly? How would you respond to someone if they asked you to cover-up the death of one of the children with you in a group on holiday? What do you have to gain. Accidents like this happen all the time. The Police haven't even bothered to level a charge of neglect against the McCanns - so there wasn't even really the threat of the rest of the group being charged to explain their cooperation.

People always say how terrible the British are for leaving their children alone in apartments in this way - but the truth is rather different. Neither the British or anyone else leave their children in either a locked or unlocked apartment in this way - not pre-school children. We have been to many apartments abroad and spoken to many couples and parents both at home and abroad and we agree that we have never heard of such a well-organised neglect model before.

It's as if the friends were purposely trying to create a 'window-of-opportunity' situation for some mythical 'abductor' all that week.

Some drunken British mothers often leave their children with friends, holiday aquaintences or relatives whilst they go out and get drunk, but what the McCanns and their friends did seems totally without precedent with pre-school children.

It is a very peculiar detail.

Each of us here will have friends. What are the chances of any them helping to cover up the death of our child? Wealthy, middle-class parents with everything to lose? No previous criminal histories? The only records they have for charitable work and medical research?

It takes a particular kind of person to cooperate in something like this. Probably 1 in every 1000 - and those are probably generous odds. The chances of getting seven other people willing to do this on one night is statistically unsound.

Amaral's 'accident theory'. Probably the best thing that ever happened to them. No wonder they aren't suing.

And why aren't they suing?

Is it because they can't or because they won't?

Suing him couldn't prompt worse revelations. All the files are out there and his book is out there. So that can't be the reason.

Is it because they 'risk to come back or to go to the prison,even uk' as shu/outono suggests?

How could this happen? The Police have already said they have no evidence to implicate them and have shelved the case - why would suing Amaral change that?

They can sue him, they choose not to.

This is now the biggest mystery.

BW

Anonymous said...

http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2008/09/06/internacional/1220677421.html

Anonymous said...

Amaral makes a complete idiot of himself in the El Mundo interview. Is it really possible to describe Calpol as 'a sleeping solution'? No. It offers a very mild form of pain relief for children who are not old enough to take stronger doses of ibuprofen or paracetemol. To describe it in this way, indicates just how far Amaral is prepared to bend the truth to validate a point. We have been giving Calpol to our own children for years. Sleep comes more as a result of fever being broken and pain relieved. It contains no sedative properties whatsoever. There are very few examples of children being overdosed by over-the-counter remedies. An overdose on Calpol has yet to be recorded. It is simply a common misconception that it has any soporific effect.

Then we have Amaral's non-sensical suggestion that everybody lied to save the group’s own sorry asses:

"if you do not know, the British law regarding negligence and child welfare is very strict. They left their children alone in the apartments. In the UK, if you leave a child alone for half an hour, you lose the custody. After Madeleine's death, if it had been made public that it was an accident, everyone could have lost custody."

If people in the UK lost custody of a child for leaving it asleep in a hotel room for half-an-hour, then social services would have floating care homes moored off Portland Harbour just to cope with the demand.

Where does he get his bonkers information from?

Here's what the law says on the matter. Being in the care-profession, they were more than likely to know this too:

"The law does not set a minimum age at which children can be left alone. However, it is an offence to leave a child alone when doing so puts him or her at risk." (NSPPC)

http://www.nspcc.org.uk/

The suggestion that the friends covered-up the death of a child in order to retain custody of their own children has no foundations at all.

And when was the last time someone was charged by proxy?

And if that alone was not bad enough, Amaral goes and contradicts himself:

Q - So you consider that one of the reasons for the parents and friends to have lied is because they feared to loose their children's custody.

A - Yes, yes. Nobody has opened legal proceedings for what happened, for the negligence, and we have asked to the British authorities why. Have they answered? Of course not.


Amaral has just stated, quite unequivocally, that "the British law regarding negligence and child welfare is very strict" and yet here he is saying that the British Authorities have no intention of commencing legal proceedings against the couple. Their reply is simply, 'of course not'.

Why? Because as it says on the NSPPC website:

"The law does not set a minimum age at which children can be left alone. However, it is an offence to leave a child alone when doing so puts him or her at risk." (NSPPC)

You'd think an inspector of his calibre would have checked out the facts of British law at this point, wouldn't you?

And so the spectacle plays on.

Anonymous said...

"He is a very strong person, dominant. He's a surgeon, a man capable of making decisions very quickly."

http://www.uhl-tr.nhs.uk/index.asp?pgid=9385

Only Gerry is NOT a surgeon he's a 'cardiac imaging specialist' - a consultant cardiologist. Cardiologists do not perform cardiac surgery themselves - they work as part of a team.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/007249.htm

What possible faith can we have in an investigator who can't even get some basic facts about his suspects right?

The Daily Mail called Gerry a 'surgeon', but one would hope Inspector Amaral was conducting his own background checks rather than accepting the word of the press?

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-488849/Guard-Gerry-McCann-returns-work.html

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 12:18

You can't expect the Portuguese investigators to know much of anything on the Wonder-neglect Couple since British Police did not send them any of the background information requested on this couple.

Anonymous said...

This article has remained as long as the DX proclamation of 'no evidence'
and is equally unreliable.

Anonymous said...

"You can't expect the Portuguese investigators to know much of anything on the Wonder-neglect Couple since British Police did not send them any of the background information requested on this couple."

But this is information that is freely available on the internet if you are prepared to look - which I am assuming the senior investigator in a major investigation might do in the absence of other resources.

I have to admit I am baffled by Amaral's statements. I have spent months defending this man on the basis of what was promised in the files. But there is very little in files of real value. Nothing truly truly convincing, anyway.

I certainly wasn't expecting him to make basic mistakes like this.

He says Gerry is a 'surgeon' but he is not. A simple look at the Glenfield website could have told him this. He says the British law is strict and children who are left alone for 30 mins are taken into custody (which is again a complete fabrication) and then he contradicts himself by saying that there is little chance of the McCanns being charged with neglect in Britain. He and others have also been keen to point out that Brits are doing this kind of thing all the time in Portugal - which suggests that British tourists do not really possess the fear of being charged with neglect (else they wouldn't take tsuch a big risk).

Whilst I expect journalists and reporters to make the occasional silly mistake I don't expect it from senior Police investigators - not when the their whole case rests upon them.

Amaral rests his entire case on saying the McCanns and their friends feared British neglect charges - this is the only motive he is willing to offer and yet the law in Britain states quite explicitly:

"The law does not set a minimum age at which children can be left alone. However, it is an offence to leave a child alone when doing so puts him or her at risk." (NSPPC)

http://www.nspcc.org.uk

A motive is fundamental to any case. It can make the whole thing unravel, but any reasonable person can see that this particular theory is flawed. Very flawed.

Seven people - and one grandmother - decided to risk everything they had in life by covering up an accidental death?

And they decided this within the space of 30-45 minutes?

And still thought it was worth risking even when the Police turned their attention on them?

These people were doctors. They are likely to have had several cases a year in which neglect charges were levelled against them as part of their job - they will have known damn well how hard it is to find someone culpable of an accidental death. They would not have feared anything of the sort.

This is a huge disappointment.

Burying a body on beach and digging it up 30 days later with the world's media flooding the area?

Nonsense. They might very well be guilty - but this is not the way it happened.

BW

Anonymous said...

I almost forgot. Amaral was happy to describe 'Calpol' as 'a sleeping solution' too. And again this is incorrect. It has no sedative qualities at all.

Did he really need British Police to send him information on this?

Do they not have over-the-counter pain-relief for children in Portugal?

Of course they do. And forensics would have told him this even if he wasn't able to work it out himself.

His statements are as bizarre and contradictory as the McCanns.

BW

Anonymous said...

quote - "The law does not set a minimum age at which children can be left alone. However, it is an offence to leave a child alone when doing so puts him or her at risk." (NSPPC)-unquote

Leaving one 3yr old and two two yrd olds alone in a atrange apartment in a starange country is leaving them at risk - anything could have happened. Hard floors easy to slip, sockets, a kitchen , an unlocked door, things to climb on and fall off, there could have been a fire...the list goes on. Also they say their child was kidnapped - OBVIOUSLY SHE WASN'T AT RISK THEN.

Anonymous said...

"Leaving one 3yr old and two two yrd olds alone in a atrange apartment in a starange country is leaving them at risk - anything could have happened. Hard floors easy to slip, sockets, a kitchen , an unlocked door, things to climb on and fall off, there could have been a fire...the list goes on. Also they say their child was kidnapped - OBVIOUSLY SHE WASN'T AT RISK THEN."

We are talking about English Law - which doesn't even extend to events taking place abroad (unless there was evidence that their behaviour was being repeated on British soil). Amaral said they were worried about losing custody of their children due to English laws - but as you quote yourself - leaving your child alone for a number of hours does not necessarily result in the loss of custody.

My wife was in Social work for 15 years before becoming a primary school teacher. There have been far greater and more shameful cases of systematic neglect than this and the parent has not lost custody.

Leaving a child in an unlocked car on a busy high-street would be considered a risk. Leaving it in a buggy on a busy-high street would be considered a risk.

It would be enormously difficult to prove that leaving children asleep in a holiday apartment constituted a deliberate and mindful indifference (or even hostility) to the welfare of the child. Which is why the Police in Portugal or Britain have not brought neglect charges against the couple or their friends.

The law doesn't account for everything that might conceivably have happened (the child slipping on a floor, waking up and diving headlong through a plate glass door, sticking sharp kitchen implements into their mouth, climbing into a micro-wave) - only those risks that can be proved put the child in clear and present danger (like leaving the child in a bathtub of water, or leaving sleeping pills or drugs on a table by their bed or something).

I think it's sick and unforgivable to leave a child in this way. The McCanns deserve no sympathy but Amaral's explanation that the group feared losing custody of their children is simply inadequate. It is also based on flawed criteria. British laws on nelgect are notoriously slack.

Social workers usually have to log instances of neglect over months before any action is taken by the courts.

Being Doctors they would know this. One of them was also a lawyer at one time. They would have known they would have had nothing to fear from a custody point of view (especially as it wasn't their children that had disappeared anyway, but someone else's). Law can't be applied by proxy.

What responsible parents see as risks is often very different to what the law sees as risks. Unfortunately.

Amaral's lie about Calpol being a 'sleeping potion' is totally unprofessional and sick, however.

No excuses there.

BW

Shu/Outono said...

I say to the person 08 September 2008 11:3 e qq coisa:

Please go to joanamorais.blogue to read all about the alacapol night and more. About the consequences.

```````

Paulo: como vai?

Anonymous said...

Calpol Night contains:

Diphenhydramine

"In smaller recreational doses (100-250mg) the side effects are mild and are mainly limited to sleepiness and labored breath. The mental effects of higher doses (250+mg) are described by many as "dreaming while awake"[10] involving visual and auditory hallucinations that, unlike those experienced with most psychedelic drugs, often cannot be readily distinguished from reality. People who consume a high recreational dose can possibly find themselves in a hallucination which places them in a familiar situation with people and friends and rooms they know, while in reality being in a totally different setting"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diphenhydr ... tional_use

"Calpol night contains a 'special' ingredient to help kids get the sleep they need" not my words, from the advert on the link below

http://www.tellyads.com/show_movie.php?filename=TA5684&advertiser=Calpol

And Calpol is available in tablet form 'Calpol melts'

Hi Paulo
I hope you are having a nice holiday

Anonymous said...

BUSTING A FEW MYTHS ABOUT CALPOL NIGHT

One of the active ingredients in Calpol Night is Diphenhydramine.

Diphenhydramine is a type of medicine called a 'sedating antihistamine'. If it enters the brain in sufficient quantities it can cause drowsiness - but it cannot induce sleep.

Diphenhydramine drys nasal secretions, by stopping a natural body chemical called histamine.

The combination of ingredients is useful for relieving mild to moderate pain such as teething pain, headaches and sore throat, and for relieving the symptoms of feverish colds and flu in children.

It doesn't make you 'sleep' but it might make you feel drowsy and more capable of falling off to sleep should you try. It is NOT a sedative in the sense that hypnotics like Benzodiazepine are.

It is no more likely to make you sleep than any other antihistamine you may take for other conditions like hayfever or other allergies like bee-stings (or even travel sickness).

Using 'heavy machinery' is not recommended when using strong antihistamines.

You often find them in cough-syrups. Diphenhydramine aid's 'restful sleep'.

It's a bit like saying 'Tixylix' is a 'sleeping potion'.

Calpol Night is not a sleeping potion. The active ingredients are there to reduce the build up of muscus (runny noses) - all the things that tickle our throat, make us cough and keep us awake.

A ''sedating antihistamine' may impair driving responses but there are no recorded of incidents of anyone falling asleep at the wheel under its influence, just as there are no recorded inclidents of children overdosing on Tixylix - a similar cough medicene.

They have a low incidence of mild side-effects:

"May cause drowsiness, dizziness or blurred vision"

Not ...

"Likely to induce coma"

The amount of Diphenhydramine in Calpol Night does not exceed 10-12mg per 500ml spoonful.

Benadryl - the hayfever treatment uses over 50mg of Diphenhydramine - and even this is not sufficent to induce sleep - only to cause drowsiness.

Taking 250mg may cause a hypnotic reaction.

Sleep aids like 'Nytol' recommend taking between 50mg & 100mg of Diphenhydramine to aid sleep. Again, taken in such small quantities as these Nytol is useful only as a 'relaxant'. It cannot induce sleep.

Calpol Night is a cough and teething remedy for small children.

The average Hayfever remedy has 4-5 times as much Diphenhydramine.

People take these hayfever remedies to work.

That's how little Diphenhydramine they contain.

The Diphenhydramine used as an active ingredient in Calpol Night is used to block the release of histamine.

Sedatives that induce sleep cannot be bought over the counter.

The facts:

Nytol (sleep aid) - 50-100mg Diphenhydramine

Benadryl (hayfever remedy) - 25mg Diphenhydramine

Broncleer (children's cough mixture) - 12.5 mg Diphenhydramine

Benadryl Night Time Cough Mixture - 12.5 mg Diphenhydramine

Calpol Night (cough/teething mixture) - 12mg Diphenhydramine

Calpol Cold (CalCold, Daytime 3 months +) - 12mg Diphenhydramine

Calpol's nightime and daytime remedies uses exactly the same amount of Diphenhydramine.

The 'Night time' element is little more than a marketing ploy.

The British Medical Journal recorded only 9 cases of accidental poisoning by cough mixture products in one year.
Of these nine cases, six were boys; eight of the cases were aged between 18 months and 5 years. Two children were admitted to hospital: one because of drowsiness and confusion, and one because of persistent dizziness. None of the preparations ingested had been in a child resistant container.

There were no recorded fatalities.

Calpol Night has no more sedative properties than the average daytime cough mixture and significantly less than the average hayfever/allergy remedy.

A 'sleeping potion' it is not. Such a description is reckless and misleading.

BW

Cláudia said...

Calpol Night



5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties

Paracetamol (ATC Code: NO2B E01) is an antipyretic analgesic with a mechanism of action that is not fully elucidated. Diphenhydramine hydrochloride (ATC Code: RO6A A02) is an antihistamine with anti-cholinergic, anti-emetic, anti-allergic and sedative effects.


"I almost forgot. Amaral was happy to describe 'Calpol' as 'a sleeping solution' too. And again this is incorrect. It has no sedative qualities at all."

It seems that twisting the truth to suit one's own agendas is not exclusive to the team, is it?

Anonymous said...

Although none of you should really need this spelling out:

Article about Calpol (not Calpol Night) from Daily Telegraph, 2005:

"Terence Stephenson, professor of child health at Nottingham University, believes their use by parents may be misguided.

"Paracetamol doesn't have any sedative properties whatsoever and neither does Nurofen," he says. "It's a widespread misconception that Calpol helps children to sleep. Doctors used to prescribe antihistamines to help children sleep, but not any longer.

"I've never seen an overdose of Calpol," says Dr Wayne Lenney, a consultant paediatrician. "The only liquid overdoses in children occur when teenagers drink too much alcohol."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/main.jhtml?xml=/health/2005/02/16/hcal16.xml

Justice for Madeleine? You people wouldn't know 'justice' if it came up and bit you squarely on the ass.

Let's just accept that Amaral was wildly exaggerating and guilty of making the evidence fit his theory. The classic mistake of over-worked, over-stressed and over-eager police officers.

Anonymous said...

(You missed this one out Paulo. I have made this one more polite)

Claudia,
You obviously have little or no knowledge of chemistry. I have run this whole issue by a friend of mine, a GP who lives next door to me, who passed on much of the information I posted above.

Amaral says Calpol was used. Calpol itself has NO sedative qualities. It is a mild paracetomol suspension for children. Calpol Night (not mentioned by Amaral but by an anonymous poster here) does have 10-12mgs of an active ingredient called Diphenhydramine (called a 'sedating antihistamine')

Compare the volume of Diphenhydramine in in each of these:

Nytol (sleep aid) - 50-100mg Diphenhydramine

Benadryl (hayfever remedy) - 25mg Diphenhydramine

Broncleer (children's cough mixture) - 12.5 mg Diphenhydramine

Benadryl Night Time Cough Mixture - 12.5 mgDiphenhydramine

DPH-Elixir (travel sickness remedy) - 12.5mg Diphenhydramine

Calpol Night (cough/teething mixture) - 12mg Diphenhydramine

Calpol Cold (CalCold, Daytime 3 months +) - 12mgDiphenhydramine

Calpol Night has no more sedative qualities than the average cough-mixture or hayfever remedy.

Calpol (normal pain relief mixture) has sedative properties at all.

So stop trying to be clever when you patently have no understanding (and no wish to understand) how these things work.

My statement that Calpol has 'no sedative properties at all' is correct.

Someone then mentioned 'Calpol Night' - and this solution does have trace amounts - but it is still not a sleeping potion. It is a cough-mixture.

The Calpol Amaral refers to though is just 'Calpol' - a mild pain-relief mixture. They are completely separate remedies - just by the same company.

Someone was trying to say 'Calpol Night' was a sleeping potion - when even this is not. It is almost as silly to describe Calpol Night as a 'sleeping potion' as Calpol.

BW

Cláudia said...

"Let's just accept that Amaral was wildly exaggerating and guilty of making the evidence fit his theory. The classic mistake of over-worked, over-stressed and over-eager police officers."

I will never accept anything from you regarding this case. I can do my own research, thank you very much.

Calpol Night

5.1 Pharmacodynamic properties

Paracetamol (ATC Code: NO2B E01) is an antipyretic analgesic with a mechanism of action that is not fully elucidated. Diphenhydramine hydrochloride (ATC Code: RO6A A02) is an antihistamine with anti-cholinergic, anti-emetic, anti-allergic and sedative effects.

Anonymous said...

Afternoon,
Why did you not post my response to Claudia who had totally misrepresented what I had said?

It seems prefectly clear to me: Calpol has no sedative properties at all - whilst Calpol Night does use small amounts of something called a 'sedating antihistamine'.

When I wrote 'calpol has no sedative qualities at all' - we were talking about Calpol and not Calpol Night (an altogether different children's remedy and brought up in a later comment).

It's a shame that most of the research presented on this case has to be done by people who are not journalists but specialists in other fields.

These issues are not really that difficult to research.

We shouldn't be scared to scrutinise Amaral's comments. If his theory is so watertight and rock-solid, we have nothing to worry about. Assessing them in more detail will only confirm his theories, right?

best regards.

BW

Paulo Reis said...

Comments about Calpol are quickly developing almost into personal insults... Can I ask all of you not to do that? Can we just exchange arguments?

Thank you

Paulo Reis

Anonymous said...

Paulo - this is my response - which I have also posted on my own site. There are are personal insults here to the best of my knowledge. I believe I have a right to correct Claudia who has misrepresented what I said. Here is my response:

Claudia,
I have run this whole issue by a friend of mine, a GP who lives next door to me, who passed on much of the information I posted above.

My statement that Calpol has 'no sedative properties at all' is correct - because we were talking about 'Calpol' and not 'Calpol Night' at the time. They are two very different medicenes.

Someone later posted a comment about 'Calpol Night' - and this solution does have trace amounts - but it is still not a sleeping potion. It is a cough-mixture. I also responded to this comment.

Amaral says Calpol was used. Calpol itself has NO sedative qualities. It is a mild paracetomol suspension for children. Calpol Night (not mentioned by Amaral but by an anonymous poster here) does have 10-12mgs of an active ingredient called Diphenhydramine (called a 'sedating antihistamine')

Compare the volume of Diphenhydramine in in each of these:

Nytol (sleep aid) - 50-100mg Diphenhydramine

Benadryl (hayfever remedy) - 25mg Diphenhydramine

Broncleer (children's cough mixture) - 12.5 mg Diphenhydramine

Benadryl Night Time Cough Mixture - 12.5 mgDiphenhydramine

DPH-Elixir (travel sickness remedy) - 12.5mg Diphenhydramine

Calpol Night (cough/teething mixture) - 12mg Diphenhydramine

Calpol Cold (CalCold, Daytime 3 months +) - 12mgDiphenhydramine

Calpol Night has no more sedative qualities than the average cough-mixture or hayfever remedy.

Calpol (normal pain relief mixture) has sedative properties at all.

The Calpol Amaral refers to though is just 'Calpol' - a mild pain-relief mixture. They are completely separate remedies - just by the same company.

Someone was trying to say 'Calpol Night' was a sleeping potion - when even this is not. It is almost as silly to describe Calpol Night as a 'sleeping potion' as Calpol.

BW

Cláudia said...

Great dogs!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akIDiz5Rv_c


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhgaJVARWz0

Anonymous said...

To the best of my knowledge the research I have provided is 100% accurate. Calpol Night is a different product to Calpol. I have children myself and am very familiar with them.

Calpol Night does include some very mild sedative qualities (Calpol doesn't, it just contains paracetemol).

The information you provide is correct - I am not arguing with that. But the amount of sedative properties it has is no greater than most over-the-counter cough remedies. Cough medicenes and hayfever medicenes have 12mg of Diphenhydramine and Calpol Night has 12mg of Diphenhydramine.

It is Diphenhydramine that is the sedative property.

You would have to increase the dose by 30 times to induce an adverse reaction and even then it is unlikely to be fatal.

To use it as a 'sleep aid' - like Nytol you have to increase the dosage to between 50mg and 100mg. This will only relax the body - not induce sleep.

The information you quote is correct - but it is exactly the same information that I quote.

It is just that I have included more details (and even links).

Children can take up 300mg of this medicene over the course of a day with no side effects at all.

Claudia, you are simply being hostile. Including cute baby pictures in your comment whilst nice - is no real substitute for humility and compassion - please show some respect for other people's opinions.

When I said there are 'no sedative properties at all' we were talking about 'Calpol' and NOT Calpol Night.

You misrepresented me.

Anonymous said...

As many here seem to be medical and pharmacological experts, perhaps someone can answer this for me: is it not true that colobomas such as Madeleine had, are often associated with other physical defects, for example, heart or neural conditions?
Therefore, is it not possible, that quantities of any given antihistamine could provoke a negative reaction in a child if such a condition was undiagnosed?

Incidentally, as far as i'm aware, 'drowsiness' is an induction to the state of sleep. Brain wave patterns show this. Anti-hystamines (diphenhydramine too) can, and do, induce sleep, independently of circadian rhythm.

WDC

Anonymous said...

I think if they sue Mr. Amaral,he can at Court,to defend himself and also his good name,talk about more and more.


*******


Oh,Paulo:está bem?
Parece impaciente.E,principalmente desde o dia 1,que nada coloca.A não ser,muito de vez em quando,um "ralhetezinho".Que se passa consigo?

Abraço,MC

Cláudia said...

You're explanations are as believable as the rotten meat and dirty nappies excuses. That is my opinion and nothing is going to change it no matter how many times you will repeat yourself.
I will not respond to your 'cute baby pictures' line, because if I did, then I would have to be a bit more than hostile. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Récemment, Brian Kennedy aurait admis qu’il serait prêt à financer Kate et Gerry McCann pour le reste de sa vie, mettant au service du couple l’entièreté de sa fortune personnelle, estimée à plus de 450 millions de livres.

******

Isto é que é amor!"por toda a minha vida eu te vou amar..."é da Ellis Regina?Tb. falecida.

LOVE TO ALL HIS LIFE TO THE mcs.His all,ALL PERSONAL money to the mcs.Please! Or a great passion....or....?

"By all my life,I will love you" bresilien song.Or the song of the film "Body guard".

S.M.- nada a dizer?

Cláudia said...

I think it's great that Mr Kennedy is willing to finance them. That way, no more good people's donations will be needed. And Mr kennedy hs plenty of money to waste.

Anonymous said...

ooops!!. Es un delito vivir en un lugar y tener la direccion de email basado en otro?....Corro a cambiar la mia/mias!!. Ya vuelvo, si es que la ley me lo permite...

By the way....
Who left the dogs out???

Shu/Outono said...

Probably the body was found....

Ah! The Rose´s body. Rose from France and Israel.


Like someone ,the couple(well,the french/Israel)said they have nothing with the Rose´s dead.
************************
"http://www.diariometro.es/x/metro/2008/09/11/RF66qk61zNekc/index.xml


"Yes, but they were looking for a girl alive, not a girl dead. In addition, I am not saying that the body remained on the beach all the time. Clearly, the first thing was to remove it from the apartment. Later they could find other solutions to hide it. Witnesses of the National Republican Guard said they had seen the McCanns directed onto the beach twice in the course of that morning. Surely they quickly found a better place."

*******

São 18:00. Faltam 6 horas para o início de um novo dia.

hug,today.And,tomorrow I will say another thing.

ALL THE BEST!

Anonymous said...

Was it a good day to bury bad news today, or was it yesterday? Gone quiet since that nasty calpol riot broke out. No more calpol challenge. No more posts. Now there's a surprise.

all the best,
AS

Anonymous said...

Is this blog over? Last update 01 September 2008?

Anonymous said...

S.M. : a super nice day;a super year;a super life.All the best!
S.

Cláudia said...

Parabéns!!!
Obrigada por todo o seu trabalho neste caso.

kc said...

Come on Paulo... the only thing that has changed on this blog last 2 weeks, is the colour of the 'make a donation' button...

Anonymous said...

Bom dia a todos.


Bom dia,Paulo e Família:

continuação de bom lazer.Merecem!
******

Goods and nices voyages.You deserve hollidays.
I hope to "see" again but You must enjoy Your´s Family and a great time!


S.

Shu/Outono said...

P.R. : I thank You a lot!

But,please put here more news. You are a Super!A must?

Shu/Outono said...

Paulo,I know You have seen the 2 vídeos:flat;car;2 casa:

You have seen the pills and the recomendations and consequences.

The children do not must have the possibility to reach them.

Of course,all comments about them,they are true.Because PJ filmed very well.

Vidéo : Eddie & Keela dans le deuxième appartement des McCann
http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/

Vidéo : Eddie & Keela et la Renault Scenic
http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/

Anonymous said...

What the McCanns said is one thing; what actually occurred from the time Mrs Fenn heard the McCanns return to their very distressed daughter up until enacting the 'syndicated' abduction on the evening of 3 May, is quite another matter.

Anonymous said...

It was widely reported that Kate cancelled cleaning services on morning of 3 May and Gerry cancelled tennis - achilles injury. Both were photographed running the next day.

What happened to the cot sheets police found missing on arrival ?
Two months after Brown's supervision of Amaral's removal, it was widely reported that further forensic evidence had been found in a barn - undisclosed location. It was reported that an Aztec design towel was sent for analysis; fibres on the towel reportedly matched fibres in boot cadaver specimens.

If true (as other leaked forensics have proved to be) - did the fibres match MW's cot sheets ?
In terms of size, they could have served to wrap the body of a 3 year old child.