Sunday, 5 April 2009

Disgusting rascals


The scoundrels who swarm editorial offices of British rags have already started to bark again, almost certainly following the orders of the advisers of the neglectful couple who left three children alone while they were gulping bottles of read and white during their holidays in Portugal. Gerry and Kate are now willing to do a ‘reconstruction’ of what happened that night, after having refused the PJ’s request to do it.

The why is understandable. The neglectful parents feared – and they were clear about it – that the reconstruction requested by the PJ was intended to confirm the statements of the nine friends who allegedly had dinner at the Ocean Club that night. This ‘initiative’ by the couple of neglectful parents is mentioned by the obedient English press, namely by “The People”, which takes the opportunity to release false information. These idiots say that the Police have renewed public appeals by displaying and handing out around 10 thousand leaflets in which information about the missing child is requested.

This could be the opportunity to ask these fools from “The People”: who is paying you to release false information? The new campaign mentioned was launched by the neglectful parents and not by the Police. As always, the pink appendix who accompanies the couple of neglectful parents vents out some innuendo aimed at causing tears to the gullible. The pink thing says that there are new elements which could lead to important leads. Yeah.. But no telling the Polícia Judiciária about that information, right?

9 comments:

Mercedes y Mila said...

Gracias por hablar alto, claro y SIN MIEDO.

Mercedes

mariac said...

o apêndice cor de rosa,espantoso.

os do "pessoas" lá de uk omitiram , ao escreverem sobre os polícias que colaboraram na colocação dos posters, a nacionalidade dos mesmos:de uk,cops de uk.

Dizem que o mcanalha saiu stressado do 5A...mas só vejo fotografias sorridentes dele.

O nosso povo mandou-os à fava e gritaram-lhes para se irem embora.BOA!
o mcanalha até já foi,se calhar.

P.R. eles não têm vergonha alguma.Depois de tudo o que fizeram a tanta gente e,principalmente à própria Filha também apanharam na real o alto descontentamento dos NOSSOS!

KC said...

not so negative Paulo... we know they are playing a game..... my favorite soap !

Anonymous said...

GERRY MAKES ONCE MORE ANOTHER STRIP AT HIS LIFE

and not:"GERRY MAKES 1ST TRIP ...."

Anonymous said...

I suppose everybody has a right to rant and start tilting at windmills all over again, but shouldn't we really be asking what they hope to achieve by all this? Would two people guilty of killing and perhaps even dismembering their child really risk dragging all this kicking and screaming back into the limelight again? Surely once you step clear of the mine you don't walk straight back into the minefield? Afterall, the reconstruction presents just as great an opportunity for someone to come forward who can contradict their version of events.

So we really have to ask: why bother? Is there money still to be made? If this is the incentive, then you have to accept that Madeleine's alleged death was no accident but was deliberately contrived to earn substantial amounts of cash from some pre-planned Maddie franchise. But given the number of people who seem to be complicit, murder seems very unlikely.

The other explanation might be this: having already been such a carefully stage-managed spectacle, the 'producers' are preparing for the drama's dénouement. Madeleine can't just 'arrive' out of the middle of nowhere because that makes for a very crude drama. Madeleine must resurface as a result of some specific action (classic and controlled storytelling) - the consequence of a sequence of events.

I get the distinct impression that this is fulfilling some earlier design.

The other question has to be: whose idea was it?

I reckon there is every chance the McCanns little reconstruction device will yield surprisingly good results.

I wonder if newspaper sales have been flagging in recent months. That's another reason to drag it back into the limelight. Afterall Paulo, you've not done too badly out of all this yourself.

BW

KC said...

welcome back BW...
always nice to read your "tilting at windmills"
started already to doubt your 'No man is true...' but reading your comment overhere makes me a believer again

guerra said...

BW it appears that you take part in the strategy sessions of the McCann team. Using your reasoning why would anybody comment on this site to defend the McCanns knowing, as you put it, that they are clear of the mine?

“The reconstruction presents just as great an opportunity for someone to come forward who can contradict their version of events. “

You must be joking right. The contradictions are endless. Come forward to whom? The Portuguese police already know about the contradictions so who should that someone contact? Should that someone contact the British government, who decided to promote the McCanns as ambassadors of child welfare while they were still suspects? I didn’t mention the British police, because it is evident that the British government has them on a short leash. Should that someone inform the British media who have expressed nothing but adulation for this couple and have resorted to censorship? Should that someone go through the British legal system? Judging from Justice Hogg’s public declarations of the couple’s innocence, while they were still suspects, it would likely be a foolish endeavour.

You ask why bother? You see, malignant narcissists have an insatiable need to be in the spotlight. They also have a need to destroy the reputation of anyone who exposes to the public who they really are, the main tactic employed being slander. What better way to accomplish their heart’s desire than by conducting a theatrical reconstruction and another pointless poster campaign. Mr. McCann must be giddy with glee, he and his wife will once again be center stage and this reconstruction, which they refused to do for the authorities, will be a slap in the face of the Portuguese police. Let’s not forget that these new campaigns are not exactly the best thing for the tourist industry that the poor locals, who scoured the country side for their daughter, depend on.

Indeed, why have so many people made fools of themselves to protect this couple? This is the question isn’t it? Obviously the McCanns are privy to some highly unflattering information. Could it be that they came up with the idea that their child was taken by a paedophile because they are on a first name basis with such people?

You can relax for now BW, the McCanns will be in the limelight for a long time making their claims that their daughter was taken by a paedophile and that there is no evidence that she has suffered any harm, however eventually life will repay them for what they have done, it always does.

Taken by a peadophile and suffering no harm, quite the oxymoron isn’t it?

Dan said...

guerra excellent post.

The Alleged sightings have not amounted to a hill of beans, but proposed book/film/TV deals amount to a substantial sum. Clarence Mitchell’s main role appears to be negotiating lucrative contracts to raise cash to find a child that the police are certain is dead. Two suspected child killers are now the hottest property on the chat-show circuit. Who says crime doesn’t pay?
How any one can believe this dispicable couple is beyone me.

Dan said...

guerra excellent post.

The Alleged sightings have not amounted to a hill of beans, but proposed book/film/TV deals amount to a substantial sum. Clarence Mitchell’s main role appears to be negotiating lucrative contracts to raise cash to find a child that the police are certain is dead. Two suspected child killers are now the hottest property on the chat-show circuit. Who says crime doesn’t pay?
How any one can believe this dispicable couple is beyone me.